Comments on: Can You Believe It?

By: Melody Johnson

Melody Johnson — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:32:04 +0000

Hey Everybody!

I just checked the USA Today top 150, and the shack isn’t #47 anymore – it’s #14!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:36:02 +0000

Awesome, Wayne.

By: Christopher Coulter

Christopher Coulter — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:22:56 +0000

If doing a screenplay (wow), I can provide some free help slash insights, not that such is worth much.

Getting started, go Final Draft, best bet, however, Movie Magic is really functional too, having lots of backers, Craig Mazin being one of the most vocal, but it just seems Final Draft is more the studio standard of sorts, though I wish they’d hurry up and kick out version 8. That company rests on its laurels as an art form, holding contests and mindless party-chumming with Hollywood biggies, not grinding down and kicking up a better product, least my perception.

Before you even get started, you MUST read “How Not to Write a Screenplay”, so you will avoid all the usual pitfalls, that doom scripts. But be wary, as locking things into ‘professional reader’ boxes, wipes away some of the grand poetry of it all, think 18th century run-on’s vs. MLA. Modern use may be correct and clean, easy to read, but the grand-sweeping beauty of language is lost in a commodity package dictated and served by some collective-grouping of egg-heady Prius-driving English-major academia knotheads. And Hollywood has it’s own form of script-Nazi knotheads.

But, standards being standards, I try and stick by Christopher Riley’s “Hollywood Standard” which is good enough of a standards bible as any out there. And Alex’s “Crafty Screenwriting” is my ‘bible’ of the trade, as I avoid all the “screenplay as art” book fluff, and Alex approaches things in the developmental real, rather than the writer lucid-dreaming perfect-world fantasy.

But no discussion on ‘screeplaying’ is ever complete without a good dose of the cynical (cynical is defined as reality on Wilshire), but “Breakfast with Sharks: A Screenwriter’s Guide to Getting the Meeting, Nailing the Pitch, Signing the Deal, and Navigating the Murky Waters of Hollywood” is a good starting point, (can you say that title in one breath, whew). And then Brooke A. Wharton’s “The Writer Got Screwed (but didn’t have to): Guide to the Legal and Business Practices of Writing for the Entertainment Industry” for lunch.

Good books, never mind the titles. I think I will pen a “Guide to Writing Big Fancy Book Titles that Over-tell You Things that a Simple Descriptive Title Should Make Obvious”.

By: jewlsntexas

jewlsntexas — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:06:11 +0000

Are you seriously working on a screenplay?

By: jewlsntexas

jewlsntexas — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:05:29 +0000

I saw The Shack in Books-a-million the other day – right in front on one of those little displays when you first walk in, and I almost squealed out loud. It is so awesome to know that the book will be so widely available.
We need to continue to pray for Willie – as the book gets more recognition, he will obviously take more heat.

By: Lindsay

Lindsay — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:23:54 +0000

What’s even more impressive than #47 at USA Today is #8 on Amazon.com. I’ve been tracking the book for several months and to the best of my knowledge, this is the first time it’s broken into the Top 10 of ALL books available on Amazon.com, not just books in the Religion & Spirituality category. Wow! There’s a real hunger out there to know the Father’s love.

By: Kelley

Kelley — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:54:56 +0000

We read The Shack when it was first published, and we were so excited about its powerful message(s) that we have since bought a case of them (plus a few more) and given the book out to several people.

We just got to meet WPYoung at a book signing at B&N this week. However, we were completely surprised to see one of our neighbors at the book signing too! Our first reaction of surprise was, “How did SHE hear about The Shack?! WE didn’t give it to her!” I guess it just proves once again what you said – God can spread a message without a marketing machine.
The Shack has brought about so many wonderful discussions about God for us. I love to hear the many different ways that people’s hearts are touched by this story! We look forward to many more interactions, and being able to share with others about His love. I agree that “He Loves Me!” is the perfect follow-up to The Shack.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:30:12 +0000

I praise God for the work that has been done through you by the Father. I have found that The Shack has led to many discussions which typically end up with “if you like the idea that Papa really loves you this much, check out “He Loves Me” and see what happened on the cross”. I have seen people changed and genuinely excited about what He has in store for them. You three are in my prayers. May Father be glorified in all of this.

Andrew

By: Melbourne Sue

Melbourne Sue — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:41:30 +0000

It never ceases being a fascinating story, Wayne, the way this whole book came about. The Body in action Who needs mammoth institutions to get stuff done? Just everyday people. Rock on

By: Joel

Joel — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:59:34 +0000

How wonderful! So many people are being blessed by this book. I love getting together with people after they finish reading it, you can see a light that has gone on. You can tell when it touches someone deeply, and most of those I know it has touched their hearts in a very cool way. I am really excited and a little nervous about it hitting the big screen, I really hope it does well making that transition. Good luck to you and thank you for continuing to be faithful to your hearts belief that God is passionate about his kids.